tv 96

3Apple TV apple tv .
- 5.0.43 .
TVKTV .
Apple TV4K HDRinfuse Pro Apple TV-InfuseVLC Apple TVinfuse.
MYDVTVapp1 ...
IDEXE ...
TVTVAndroid ...
bTVTVBBLL ...
2.01UI2 ...

3Apple TV apple tv .
TVKTV .
Apple TV4K HDRinfuse Pro Apple TV-InfuseVLC Apple TVinfuse.
MYDVTVapp1 ...
IDEXE ...
TVTVAndroid ...
bTVTVBBLL ...
2.01UI2 ...
First day flying less than 50 km is day 10.
#### 7A herpetologist captures 4 frogs, 3 snakes, and 5 lizards during a field study. Each frog has 6 legs temporarily lost, each snake has no legs, and each lizard retains 4 functional legs. If adult members of these species have exactly the stated number of legs when present, how many total functional legs are present among all animals?
Alternate interpretation: losing 6 legs implies they had fewer, but original counts are assumed unless stated otherwise.
But problem says each frog has 6 legs temporarily lost — this is ambiguous. Better: they had the usual, but now lost 6—so 0 functional legs. But that makes no sense.
But that seems inconsistent with temporarily lost implying possible regrowth, but not stated.
Wait — perhaps temporarily lost means they are lost due to damage, but functional legs are what remain — but if destroyed, they are gone. But functional legs suggest survival.
Better interpretation: the concept is that frogs lose 6 legs (from original count?), but original counts are not given.
Ah — critical: the problem says 4 frogs, each has 6 legs temporarily lost — but 6 legs per frog? Normal is 4.
Ah — this must be a trick: frogs normally have 4 legs, but here they lost 6 legs — impossible.
Reframe: likely typo or misstatement.