money talks

MoneyDJMoneyDJ ...
It's not about the money, money, money We don't need your money, money, money We just wanna make the world dance Forget about the Price Tag .
MoneyDJ
MoneyDJ
AI-N () () () AI ...
---MoneyDJ
MoneyDJ ...

MoneyDJMoneyDJ ...
It's not about the money, money, money We don't need your money, money, money We just wanna make the world dance Forget about the Price Tag .
MoneyDJ
MoneyDJ
AI-N () () () AI ...
---MoneyDJ
MoneyDJ ...
First day flying less than 50 km is day 10.
#### 7A herpetologist captures 4 frogs, 3 snakes, and 5 lizards during a field study. Each frog has 6 legs temporarily lost, each snake has no legs, and each lizard retains 4 functional legs. If adult members of these species have exactly the stated number of legs when present, how many total functional legs are present among all animals?
Alternate interpretation: losing 6 legs implies they had fewer, but original counts are assumed unless stated otherwise.
But problem says each frog has 6 legs temporarily lost — this is ambiguous. Better: they had the usual, but now lost 6—so 0 functional legs. But that makes no sense.
But that seems inconsistent with temporarily lost implying possible regrowth, but not stated.
Wait — perhaps temporarily lost means they are lost due to damage, but functional legs are what remain — but if destroyed, they are gone. But functional legs suggest survival.
Better interpretation: the concept is that frogs lose 6 legs (from original count?), but original counts are not given.
Ah — critical: the problem says 4 frogs, each has 6 legs temporarily lost — but 6 legs per frog? Normal is 4.
Ah — this must be a trick: frogs normally have 4 legs, but here they lost 6 legs — impossible.
Reframe: likely typo or misstatement.